netdev - [PATCH 12/12] net/Bluetooth/smp - use the correct print format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1621511073-47766-13-git-send-email-yekai13@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 19:44:33 +0800
From:   Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>
To:     <marcel@...tmann.org>, <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yekai13@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] net/Bluetooth/smp - use the correct print format

According to Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst,
Use the correct print format. Printing an unsigned int value should use %u
instead of %d. Otherwise printk() might end up displaying negative numbers.

Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/smp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index 2def906..56c59f8 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
 	memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
 	clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags);
 
-	bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io,
+	bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "auth:%u lcl:%u rem:%u", auth, local_io,
 		   remote_io);
 
 	/* If neither side wants MITM, either "just" confirm an incoming
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
 		get_random_bytes(&passkey, sizeof(passkey));
 		passkey %= 1000000;
 		put_unaligned_le32(passkey, smp->tk);
-		bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", passkey);
+		bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %u", passkey);
 		set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags);
 	}
 
@@ -1654,7 +1654,7 @@ int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
 	case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_REPLY:
 		value = le32_to_cpu(passkey);
 		memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
-		bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", value);
+		bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %u", value);
 		put_unaligned_le32(value, smp->tk);
 		fallthrough;
 	case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_REPLY:
-- 
2.8.1