[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae7d9137-af9f-7434-a1ea-f390765a73eb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:52:08 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next resend] sfc: farch: fix compile warning in
efx_farch_dimension_resources()
On 20/05/2021 03:13, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2021/5/19 22:40, Edward Cree wrote:
>> As I said the first time you sent this:
>> Reverse xmas tree is messed up here, please fix.
>> Apart from that, LGTM.
>
> Do you mean like this:
That's one way to do it. But, a couple of nits:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
>
> index 6048b08b89ec..b16f04cf7223 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
> @@ -1668,10 +1668,10 @@ void efx_farch_rx_pull_indir_table(struct efx_nic *efx)
> */
> void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
> {
> - unsigned vi_count, total_tx_channels;
> + unsigned total_tx_channels, vi_count;
No need to change the order of decls within a line.
>
Probably this blank line should be removed while we're at it.
> #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
> - struct siena_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
> + struct siena_nic_data *nic_data;
> unsigned buftbl_min;
> #endif
>
> @@ -1679,6 +1679,7 @@ void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
> vi_count = max(efx->n_channels, total_tx_channels * EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
> + nic_data = efx->nic_data;
> /* Account for the buffer table entries backing the datapath channels
> * and the descriptor caches for those channels.
> */
Otherwise, looks fine.
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists