[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520062648.ejqufb6m5wr6z7k2@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 23:26:48 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/11] tcp: Keep TCP_CLOSE sockets in the
reuseport group.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 09:22:50AM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> +static int reuseport_resurrect(struct sock *sk, struct sock_reuseport *old_reuse,
> + struct sock_reuseport *reuse, bool bind_inany)
> +{
> + if (old_reuse == reuse) {
> + /* If sk was in the same reuseport group, just pop sk out of
> + * the closed section and push sk into the listening section.
> + */
> + __reuseport_detach_closed_sock(sk, old_reuse);
> + __reuseport_add_sock(sk, old_reuse);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (!reuse) {
> + /* In bind()/listen() path, we cannot carry over the eBPF prog
> + * for the shutdown()ed socket. In setsockopt() path, we should
> + * not change the eBPF prog of listening sockets by attaching a
> + * prog to the shutdown()ed socket. Thus, we will allocate a new
> + * reuseport group and detach sk from the old group.
> + */
For the reuseport_attach_prog() path, I think it needs to consider
the reuse->num_closed_socks != 0 case also and that should belong
to the resurrect case. For example, when
sk_unhashed(sk) but sk->sk_reuseport == 0.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists