netdev - [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: wan: add blank line after declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1621867637-2680-4-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 22:47:10 +0800
From:   Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
        <ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lipeng321@...wei.com>, <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>,
        <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: wan: add blank line after declarations

From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>

This patch fixes the checkpatch error about missing a blank line
after declarations.

Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
index afca54cf3e82..566c519c6f65 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t pci_map_single_debug(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *ptr,
 					      size_t size, int direction)
 {
 	dma_addr_t addr = dma_map_single(&pdev->dev, ptr, size, direction);
+
 	if (addr + size > 0x100000000LL)
 		pr_crit("%s: pci_map_single() returned memory at 0x%llx!\n",
 			pci_name(pdev), (unsigned long long)addr);
@@ -150,6 +151,7 @@ static inline void wanxl_cable_intr(struct port *port)
 static inline void wanxl_tx_intr(struct port *port)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = port->dev;
+
 	while (1) {
                 desc_t *desc = &get_status(port)->tx_descs[port->tx_in];
 		struct sk_buff *skb = port->tx_skbs[port->tx_in];
@@ -181,6 +183,7 @@ static inline void wanxl_tx_intr(struct port *port)
 static inline void wanxl_rx_intr(struct card *card)
 {
 	desc_t *desc;
+
 	while (desc = &card->status->rx_descs[card->rx_in],
 	       desc->stat != PACKET_EMPTY) {
 		if ((desc->stat & PACKET_PORT_MASK) > card->n_ports)
@@ -662,6 +665,7 @@ static int wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < RX_QUEUE_LENGTH; i++) {
 		struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(BUFFER_LENGTH);
+
 		card->rx_skbs[i] = skb;
 		if (skb)
 			card->status->rx_descs[i].address =
@@ -729,6 +733,7 @@ static int wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 		hdlc_device *hdlc;
 		struct port *port = &card->ports[i];
 		struct net_device *dev = alloc_hdlcdev(port);
+
 		if (!dev) {
 			pr_err("%s: unable to allocate memory\n",
 			       pci_name(pdev));
-- 
2.8.1