[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210524155941.16376-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:59:40 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: <pmladek@...e.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
<w@....eu>, <lkml@....org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lib: test_scanf: Fix incorrect use of type_min() with unsigned types
sparse was producing warnings of the form:
sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1)
The problem was that value_representable_in_type() compared unsigned types
against type_min(). But type_min() is only valid for signed types because
it is calculating the value -type_max() - 1. The minimum value of an
unsigned is obviously 0, so only type_max() need be tested.
This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of
simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and
negative test.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Fixes: 17aadada455d ("lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion")
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
---
lib/test_scanf.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_scanf.c b/lib/test_scanf.c
index 8d577aec6c28..48ff5747a4da 100644
--- a/lib/test_scanf.c
+++ b/lib/test_scanf.c
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ static const unsigned long long numbers[] __initconst = {
#define value_representable_in_type(T, val) \
(is_signed_type(T) \
? ((long long)(val) >= type_min(T)) && ((long long)(val) <= type_max(T)) \
- : ((unsigned long long)(val) >= type_min(T)) && \
- ((unsigned long long)(val) <= type_max(T)))
+ : ((unsigned long long)(val) <= type_max(T)))
+
#define test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, val, fn) \
do { \
@@ -204,12 +204,11 @@ do { \
int i; \
\
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(numbers); i++) { \
- if (!value_representable_in_type(T, numbers[i])) \
- continue; \
- \
- test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, numbers[i], fn); \
+ if (value_representable_in_type(T, numbers[i])) \
+ test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, \
+ numbers[i], fn); \
\
- if (is_signed_type(T)) \
+ if (value_representable_in_type(T, -numbers[i])) \
test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, \
-numbers[i], fn); \
} \
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists