| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKKgK4y77NNN7N81GOdTm=btirDCv0uLGqESjuhccZs1CB5opg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:14:41 +0300
From: Shai Malin <malin1024@...il.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, hch@....de, axboe@...com,
kbusch@...nel.org, Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>, okulkarni@...vell.com,
pkushwaha@...vell.com, Dean Balandin <dbalandin@...vell.com>,
Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 03/27] nvme-tcp-offload: Add device scan implementation
On 5/22/21 1:22 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 5/19/21 4:13 AM, Shai Malin wrote:
> > From: Dean Balandin <dbalandin@...vell.com>
> >
> > As part of create_ctrl(), it scans the registered devices and calls
> > the claim_dev op on each of them, to find the first devices that matches
> > the connection params. Once the correct devices is found (claim_dev
> > returns true), we raise the refcnt of that device and return that device
> > as the device to be used for ctrl currently being created.
> >
> > Acked-by: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dean Balandin <dbalandin@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Omkar Kulkarni <okulkarni@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvme/host/tcp-offload.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp-offload.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp-offload.c
> > index 711232eba339..aa7cc239abf2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp-offload.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp-offload.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
> > static LIST_HEAD(nvme_tcp_ofld_devices);
> > static DECLARE_RWSEM(nvme_tcp_ofld_devices_rwsem);
> >
> > +static inline struct nvme_tcp_ofld_ctrl *to_tcp_ofld_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *nctrl)
> > +{
> > + return container_of(nctrl, struct nvme_tcp_ofld_ctrl, nctrl);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * nvme_tcp_ofld_register_dev() - NVMeTCP Offload Library registration
> > * function.
> > @@ -98,6 +103,94 @@ void nvme_tcp_ofld_req_done(struct nvme_tcp_ofld_req *req,
> > /* Placeholder - complete request with/without error */
> > }
> >
> > +struct nvme_tcp_ofld_dev *
> > +nvme_tcp_ofld_lookup_dev(struct nvme_tcp_ofld_ctrl *ctrl)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_tcp_ofld_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + down_read(&nvme_tcp_ofld_devices_rwsem);
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev, &nvme_tcp_ofld_devices, entry) {
> > + if (dev->ops->claim_dev(dev, &ctrl->conn_params)) {
> > + /* Increase driver refcnt */
> > + if (!try_module_get(dev->ops->module)) {
>
> This means that every controller will take a long-lived reference on the
> module? Why?
This is in order to create a per controller dependency between the
nvme-tcp-offload and the vendor driver which is currently used.
We believe that the vendor driver which offloads a controller should exist
as long as the controller exists.
>
> > + pr_err("try_module_get failed\n");
> > + dev = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev = NULL;
> > +out:
> > + up_read(&nvme_tcp_ofld_devices_rwsem);
> > +
> > + return dev;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nvme_tcp_ofld_setup_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *nctrl, bool new)
> > +{
> > + /* Placeholder - validates inputs and creates admin and IO queues */
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct nvme_ctrl *
> > +nvme_tcp_ofld_create_ctrl(struct device *ndev, struct nvmf_ctrl_options *opts)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_tcp_ofld_ctrl *ctrl;
> > + struct nvme_tcp_ofld_dev *dev;
> > + struct nvme_ctrl *nctrl;
> > + int rc = 0;
> > +
> > + ctrl = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ctrl)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + nctrl = &ctrl->nctrl;
> > +
> > + /* Init nvme_tcp_ofld_ctrl and nvme_ctrl params based on received opts */
> > +
> > + /* Find device that can reach the dest addr */
> > + dev = nvme_tcp_ofld_lookup_dev(ctrl);
> > + if (!dev) {
> > + pr_info("no device found for addr %s:%s.\n",
> > + opts->traddr, opts->trsvcid);
> > + rc = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_free_ctrl;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ctrl->dev = dev;
> > +
> > + if (ctrl->dev->ops->max_hw_sectors)
> > + nctrl->max_hw_sectors = ctrl->dev->ops->max_hw_sectors;
> > + if (ctrl->dev->ops->max_segments)
> > + nctrl->max_segments = ctrl->dev->ops->max_segments;
> > +
> > + /* Init queues */
> > +
> > + /* Call nvme_init_ctrl */
> > +
> > + rc = ctrl->dev->ops->setup_ctrl(ctrl, true);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto out_module_put;
>
> goto module_put without an explicit module_get is confusing.
We will modify the function to use explicit module_get so it will be clear.
>
> > +
> > + rc = nvme_tcp_ofld_setup_ctrl(nctrl, true);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto out_uninit_ctrl;
>
> ops->setup_ctrl and then call to nvme_tcp_ofld_setup_ctrl?
> Looks weird, why are these separated?
We will move the vendor specific setup_ctrl() call into
nvme_tcp_ofld_setup_ctrl().
>
> > +
> > + return nctrl;
> > +
> > +out_uninit_ctrl:
> > + ctrl->dev->ops->release_ctrl(ctrl);
> > +out_module_put:
> > + module_put(dev->ops->module);
> > +out_free_ctrl:
> > + kfree(ctrl);
> > +
> > + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct nvmf_transport_ops nvme_tcp_ofld_transport = {
> > .name = "tcp_offload",
> > .module = THIS_MODULE,
> > @@ -107,6 +200,7 @@ static struct nvmf_transport_ops nvme_tcp_ofld_transport = {
> > NVMF_OPT_RECONNECT_DELAY | NVMF_OPT_HDR_DIGEST |
> > NVMF_OPT_DATA_DIGEST | NVMF_OPT_NR_POLL_QUEUES |
> > NVMF_OPT_TOS,
> > + .create_ctrl = nvme_tcp_ofld_create_ctrl,
> > };
> >
> > static int __init nvme_tcp_ofld_init_module(void)
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists