[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210526172346.3515587-12-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:23:46 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sassmann@...hat.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>,
Dave Switzer <david.switzer@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 11/11] ixgbe: reduce checker warnings
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Fix the sparse warnings in the ixgbe crypto offload code. These
changes were made in the most conservative way (force cast)
in order to hopefully not break the code. I suspect that the
code might still be broken on big-endian architectures, but
no one is complaining, so I'm just leaving it functionally
the same.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Tested-by: Dave Switzer <david.switzer@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
Warning Detail:
.../ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c:514:56: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer
.../ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c:521:48: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer
.../ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c:536:59: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer
.../ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c:546:59: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
index 54d47265a7ac..e596e1a9fc75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
@@ -511,14 +511,14 @@ static int ixgbe_ipsec_check_mgmt_ip(struct xfrm_state *xs)
continue;
reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, MIPAF_ARR(3, i));
- if (reg == xs->id.daddr.a4)
+ if (reg == (__force u32)xs->id.daddr.a4)
return 1;
}
}
if ((bmcipval & BMCIP_MASK) == BMCIP_V4) {
reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_BMCIP(3));
- if (reg == xs->id.daddr.a4)
+ if (reg == (__force u32)xs->id.daddr.a4)
return 1;
}
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int ixgbe_ipsec_check_mgmt_ip(struct xfrm_state *xs)
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, MIPAF_ARR(i, j));
- if (reg != xs->id.daddr.a6[j])
+ if (reg != (__force u32)xs->id.daddr.a6[j])
break;
}
if (j == 4) /* did we match all 4 words? */
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int ixgbe_ipsec_check_mgmt_ip(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if ((bmcipval & BMCIP_MASK) == BMCIP_V6) {
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_BMCIP(j));
- if (reg != xs->id.daddr.a6[j])
+ if (reg != (__force u32)xs->id.daddr.a6[j])
break;
}
if (j == 4) /* did we match all 4 words? */
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists