| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:53:13 -0700
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>,
Matt Mathis <mattmathis@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>,
Leonard Crestez <lcrestez@...venets.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 1/3] tcp: Use smaller mtu probes if RACK is enabled
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:11 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 6:38 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > RACK allows detecting a loss in rtt + min_rtt / 4 based on just one
> > extra packet. If enabled use this instead of relying of fast retransmit.
>
> IMHO it would be worth adding some more text to motivate the change,
> to justify the added complexity and risk from the change. The
> substance of the change seems to be decreasing the requirement for
> PMTU probing from needing roughly 5 packets worth of data to needing
> roughly 3 packets worth of data. It's not clear to me as a reader of
> this patch by itself that there are lots of applications that very
> often only have 3-4 packets worth of data to send and yet can benefit
> greatly from PMTU discovery.
>
> > Suggested-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 5 +++++
> > include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 7 +++++++
> > net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> > index a5c250044500..7ab52a105a5d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> > @@ -349,10 +349,15 @@ tcp_mtu_probe_floor - INTEGER
> > If MTU probing is enabled this caps the minimum MSS used for search_low
> > for the connection.
> >
> > Default : 48
> >
> > +tcp_mtu_probe_rack - BOOLEAN
> > + Try to use shorter probes if RACK is also enabled
> > +
> > + Default: 1
>
> I would vote to not have a sysctl for this. If we think it's a good
> idea to allow MTU probing with a smaller amount of data if RACK is
> enabled (which seems true to me), then this is a low-risk enough
> change that we should just change the behavior.
+1 to not have another sysctl
>
> > tcp_min_snd_mss - INTEGER
> > TCP SYN and SYNACK messages usually advertise an ADVMSS option,
> > as described in RFC 1122 and RFC 6691.
> >
> > If this ADVMSS option is smaller than tcp_min_snd_mss,
> > diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> > index 746c80cd4257..b4ff12f25a7f 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> > @@ -112,10 +112,11 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV
> > u8 sysctl_tcp_l3mdev_accept;
> > #endif
> > u8 sysctl_tcp_mtu_probing;
> > int sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_floor;
> > + int sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack;
> > int sysctl_tcp_base_mss;
> > int sysctl_tcp_min_snd_mss;
> > int sysctl_tcp_probe_threshold;
> > u32 sysctl_tcp_probe_interval;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> > index 4fa77f182dcb..275c91fb9cf8 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> > @@ -847,10 +847,17 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
> > .mode = 0644,
> > .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> > .extra1 = &tcp_min_snd_mss_min,
> > .extra2 = &tcp_min_snd_mss_max,
> > },
> > + {
> > + .procname = "tcp_mtu_probe_rack",
> > + .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack,
> > + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> > + .mode = 0644,
> > + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> > + },
> > {
> > .procname = "tcp_probe_threshold",
> > .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_probe_threshold,
> > .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> > .mode = 0644,
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > index 4f5b68a90be9..ed8af4a7325b 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > @@ -2892,10 +2892,11 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_base_mss = TCP_BASE_MSS;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_min_snd_mss = TCP_MIN_SND_MSS;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_probe_threshold = TCP_PROBE_THRESHOLD;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_probe_interval = TCP_PROBE_INTERVAL;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_floor = TCP_MIN_SND_MSS;
> > + net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack = 1;
> >
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time = TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_probes = TCP_KEEPALIVE_PROBES;
> > net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_intvl = TCP_KEEPALIVE_INTVL;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > index bde781f46b41..9691f435477b 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > @@ -2311,10 +2311,19 @@ static bool tcp_can_coalesce_send_queue_head(struct sock *sk, int len)
> > }
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Check if rack is supported for current connection */
> > +static int tcp_mtu_probe_is_rack(const struct sock *sk)
> > +{
> > + struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> > +
> > + return (net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery & TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION &&
> > + net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack);
> > +}
>
> You may want to use the existing helper, tcp_is_rack(), by moving it
> to include/net/tcp.h
>
> thanks,
> neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists