netdev - [PATCH v2] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 09:16:24 +0800
From:   samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@....com>
To:     krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels

From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>

Some labels are only used once, so we delete them and use the
return statement instead of the goto statement.

Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
index c6a9d30..94b6000 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETINFO,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_INFO, skb->len);
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETDATA,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_DATA, skb->len);
@@ -150,7 +149,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -216,7 +214,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 	r = nci_hci_get_param(ndev, param->gate, param->data, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_GET_PARAM, skb->len);
@@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -262,7 +259,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 				HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE, skb->len);
@@ -281,7 +278,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -299,7 +295,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON, skb->len);
@@ -318,7 +314,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1