[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210527043609.654854-14-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:36:05 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next 13/17] net/mlx5: Remove unnecessary spin lock protection
From: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Taking lag_lock to access ldev->tracker is meaningless in the context of
do_bond() and mlx5_lag_netdev_event().
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag.c
index b8748390335f..c9c00163d918 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag.c
@@ -280,9 +280,7 @@ static void mlx5_do_bond(struct mlx5_lag *ldev)
if (!mlx5_lag_is_ready(ldev))
return;
- spin_lock(&lag_lock);
tracker = ldev->tracker;
- spin_unlock(&lag_lock);
do_bond = tracker.is_bonded && mlx5_lag_check_prereq(ldev);
@@ -481,9 +479,7 @@ static int mlx5_lag_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
break;
}
- spin_lock(&lag_lock);
ldev->tracker = tracker;
- spin_unlock(&lag_lock);
if (changed)
mlx5_queue_bond_work(ldev, 0);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists