netdev - Re: [PATCH leds v1 4/5] leds: trigger: netdev: support HW offloading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YLD1ELr5csaat6Uk@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 15:50:08 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc:     Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH leds v1 4/5] leds: trigger: netdev: support HW offloading

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 08:45:56AM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 18:57:17 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:00:19PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > Add support for HW offloading of the netdev trigger.
> > > 
> > > We need to export the netdev_led_trigger variable so that drivers
> > > may check whether the LED is set to this trigger.  
> > 
> > Without seeing the driver side, it is not obvious to me why this is
> > needed. Please add the driver changes to this patchset, so we can
> > fully see how the API works.
> 
> OK, I will send an implementation for leds-turris-omnia with v2.
> 
> The idea is that the trigger_offload() method should check which
> trigger it should offload. A potential LED controller may be configured
> to link the LED on net activity, or on SATA activity. So the method
> should do something like this:
> 
>   static int my_trigger_offload(struct led_classdev *cdev, bool enable)
>   {
>     if (!enable)
>       return my_disable_hw_triggering(cdev);
> 	
>     if (cdev->trigger == &netdev_led_trigger)
>       return my_offload_netdev_triggering(cdev);
>     else if (cdev->trigger == &blkdev_led_trigger)
>       return my_offload_blkdev_triggering(cdev);
>     else
>       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   }

So the hardware driver does not need the contents of the trigger? It
never manipulates the trigger. Maybe to keep the abstraction cleaner,
an enum can be added to the trigger to identify it. The code then
becomes:

static int my_trigger_offload(struct led_classdev *cdev, bool enable)
{
	if (!enable)
        	return my_disable_hw_triggering(cdev);
 	
	switch(cdev->trigger->trigger) {
	case TRIGGER_NETDEV:
	       return my_offload_netdev_triggering(cdev);
	case TRIGGER_BLKDEV:
	       return my_offload_blkdev_triggering(cdev);
	default:
	       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}	

	Andrew