[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3494dcf6-14ca-be2b-dbf8-dda2e208b70b@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:32:15 -0500
From: "Bajjuri, Praneeth" <praneeth@...com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "Modi, Geet" <geet.modi@...com>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] net: phy: dp83867: perform soft reset and
retain established link
Hi Andrew,
On 3/31/2021 11:35 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > as per datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/dp83867cr.pdf
>>
>> > 8.6.26 Control Register (CTRL)
>> > do SW_RESTART to perform a reset not including the registers and is
>> > acceptable to do this if a link is already present.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't see any code here to determine if the like is present. What if
>> the cable is not plugged in?
>>
>> This API is primarily used for reset. Link Status is checked thru different
>> register. This shall not impact the cable plug in/out. With this change, it
>> will align with DP83822 driver API.
>
> So why is there the comment:
>
>> > and is
>> > acceptable to do this if a link is already present.
>
> That kind of says, it is not acceptable to do this if the link is not
> present. Which is why i'm asking.
Does the feedback from Geet help in clarity you requested.
Ref:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/4838EA12-7BF4-4FF2-8305-7446C3498DDF@ti.com/
>
> Andrew
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists