netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] Convert xpcs to phylink_pcs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 12:12:30 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
        Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] Convert xpcs to phylink_pcs_ops

Hi VK,

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:15:21AM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> I got the following kernel panic after applying [1], and followed by
> this patch series.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210527155959.3270478-1-olteanv@gmail.com/
> 
> [   10.742057] libphy: stmmac: probed
> [   10.750396] mdio_bus stmmac-1:01: attached PHY driver [unbound] (mii_bus:phy_addr=stmmac-1:01, irq=POLL)
> [   10.818222] intel-eth-pci 0000:00:1e.4 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): failed to validate link configuration for in-band status
> [   10.830348] intel-eth-pci 0000:00:1e.4 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): failed to setup phy (-22)

Thanks a lot for testing. Sadly I can't figure out what is the mistake.
Could you please add this debugging patch on top and let me know what it
prints?

-----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------
>From 1d745a51b53b38df432a33849632a1b553d3f90a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:17 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] xpcs debug

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
 drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
index 194b79da547b..4268b8bb8db0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
@@ -675,30 +675,39 @@ static void xpcs_resolve_pma(struct mdio_xpcs_args *xpcs,
 void xpcs_validate(struct mdio_xpcs_args *xpcs, unsigned long *supported,
 		   struct phylink_link_state *state)
 {
-	bool valid_interface;
-
-	if (state->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA) {
-		valid_interface = true;
-	} else {
+	if (state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA) {
 		struct xpcs_id *id = xpcs->id;
+		bool valid_interface = false;
 		int i;
 
-		valid_interface = false;
-
 		for (i = 0; id->interface[i] != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MAX; i++) {
-			if (id->interface[i] != state->interface)
+			if (id->interface[i] != state->interface) {
+				dev_err(&xpcs->mdiodev->dev,
+					"%s: provided interface %s does not match supported interface %d (%s)\n",
+					__func__, phy_modes(state->interface),
+					i, phy_modes(id->interface[i]));
 				continue;
+			}
 
 			valid_interface = true;
 			break;
 		}
-	}
 
-	if (!valid_interface) {
-		bitmap_zero(supported, __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
-		return;
+		if (!valid_interface) {
+			dev_err(&xpcs->mdiodev->dev,
+				"%s: provided interface %s does not match any supported interface\n",
+				__func__, phy_modes(state->interface));
+			bitmap_zero(supported, __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
+			return;
+		}
 	}
 
+	dev_err(&xpcs->mdiodev->dev,
+		"%s: supported mask for interface %s is %*pb, received supported mask is %*pb\n",
+		__func__, phy_modes(state->interface),
+		__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, xpcs->supported,
+		__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, supported);
+
 	linkmode_and(supported, supported, xpcs->supported);
 	linkmode_and(state->advertising, state->advertising, xpcs->supported);
 }
@@ -987,8 +996,17 @@ struct mdio_xpcs_args *xpcs_create(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
 		if ((xpcs_id & entry->mask) != entry->id)
 			continue;
 
-		for (i = 0; entry->supported[i] != __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS; i++)
+		dev_err(&mdiodev->dev, "%s: xpcs_id %x matched on entry %d\n",
+			__func__, xpcs_id, i);
+
+		for (i = 0; entry->supported[i] != __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS; i++) {
+			dev_err(&mdiodev->dev, "%s: setting entry->supported bit %d\n",
+				__func__, entry->supported[i]);
 			set_bit(entry->supported[i], xpcs->supported);
+		}
+
+		dev_err(&mdiodev->dev, "%s: xpcs->supported %*pb\n", __func__,
+			__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, xpcs->supported);
 
 		xpcs->id = entry;
 		xpcs->an_mode = entry->an_mode;
-----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------