[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60B2E0FF.4030705@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:03 +0300
From: Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@...il.com>
To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: tedheadster <tedheadster@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, whiteheadm@....org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 problem on 486.
Hi all,
30.05.2021 0:44, tedheadster:
>> This driver hasn't seen functional changes for ages. Any previous kernel
>> version that works fine so that you could bisect? It will be hard to
>> find any developer who has test hw, especially as your issue seems to be
>> system-dependent.
>> Please provide a full dmesg log, maybe it provides a hint.
>
> I have a few active 80486 test systems (the 5.12.7 kernel works fine
> on 80486) that I might be able to help test with too.
Unfortunately I don't have any proven-to-work-well previous kernel for
this specific hardware config, and dmesg does not show anything even
slightly usefull.
However, I've just installed Debian Woody (kernel 2.2.20, gcc 2.95) and
got something interesting. There are two interfaces shown in ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:6B:32:85:74
inet addr:192.168.0.3 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
......
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6000
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:6B:32:85:74
inet addr:192.168.0.4 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
......
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x8000
whereas actually only one physical network card present. One can notice
HWaddr and Irq is the same, although base addr is not.
lspci says:
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139
(rev 10)
Now as soon as ip configuration is done preperly, I can ifup any of them
successfully.
And, eth0 shows some familiar misbehaviour: I can do ssh, but scp large
file fails with subsequent communication breakdown. On the other hand,
eth1 works fine, scp and iperf3 (both as a client and as a server) show
quite regular operation. I'm puzzled a bit. But at least it looks like a
possible starting point.
Thank you,
Regards,
Nikolai
>
> - Matthew
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists