netdev - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 07/16] ath6kl: return error code in ath6kl_wmi_set_roam_lrssi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YLVRxE04XbJXsxPW@sashalap>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 17:14:44 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@...rudhrb.com>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 07/16] ath6kl: return error code in
 ath6kl_wmi_set_roam_lrssi_cmd()

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:47:00PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> From: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@...rudhrb.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit fc6a6521556c8250e356ddc6a3f2391aa62dc976 ]
>>
>> ath6kl_wmi_cmd_send could fail, so let's return its error code
>> upstream.
>
>Something went very wrong here.
>
>Content is okay, but "upstream commit" label is wrong, pointing to
>incomplete fix that was reverted (with different content and different
>author).

Yup, what ended up happening here is that my scripts got confused by the
reverted commit and the real fix having the same subject line. I've
fixed up my scripts and this patch was dropped. Thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha