netdev - Re: [RFC V2 net-next 1/3] ethtool: extend coalesce setting uAPI with CQE mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dbdfcac5-f772-1b73-7af8-af2340f21aea@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 09:24:01 +0800
From:   Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        <huangdaode@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        <dledford@...hat.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <netanel@...zon.com>,
        <akiyano@...zon.com>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        <irusskikh@...vell.com>, <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>, <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
        <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        <ioana.ciornei@....com>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <merez@...eaurora.org>, <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 net-next 1/3] ethtool: extend coalesce setting uAPI with
 CQE mode


On 2021/5/30 5:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2021 11:22:14 +0800 Huazhong Tan wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst b/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
>> index 25131df..8e8c6b3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
>> @@ -937,6 +937,8 @@ Kernel response contents:
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_TX_USECS_HIGH``         u32     delay (us), high Tx
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_TX_MAX_FRAMES_HIGH``    u32     max packets, high Tx
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_RATE_SAMPLE_INTERVAL``  u32     rate sampling interval
>> +  ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_TX``	       bool    timer reset in CQE, Tx
>> +  ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_RX``	       bool    timer reset in CQE, Rx
>>     ===========================================  ======  =======================
>>   
>>   Attributes are only included in reply if their value is not zero or the
>> @@ -975,6 +977,8 @@ Request contents:
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_TX_USECS_HIGH``         u32     delay (us), high Tx
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_TX_MAX_FRAMES_HIGH``    u32     max packets, high Tx
>>     ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_RATE_SAMPLE_INTERVAL``  u32     rate sampling interval
>> +  ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_TX``	       bool    timer reset in CQE, Tx
>> +  ``ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_RX``	       bool    timer reset in CQE, Rx
>>     ===========================================  ======  =======================
>>   
>>   Request is rejected if it attributes declared as unsupported by driver (i.e.
> Did you provide the theory of operation for CQE vs EQE mode somewhere,
> as I requested?


the definition of enum dim_cq_period_mode in include/linux/dim.h has

below comment:

/**
  * enum dim_cq_period_mode - Modes for CQ period count
  *
  * @DIM_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_EQE: Start counting from EQE
  * @DIM_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_CQE: Start counting from CQE (implies 
timer reset)
  * @DIM_CQ_PERIOD_NUM_MODES: Number of modes
  */


is this comment suitable? and add reference in 
Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst to

the comment in dim.h.


>> +	[ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_MODE_TX]	= { .type = NLA_U8 },
>> +	[ETHTOOL_A_COALESCE_USE_CQE_MODE_RX]	= { .type = NLA_U8 },
> Why not NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U8, 1) ?


will fix it.


> Any chance you could split the patch into adding the new parameter
> to the callback and adding new attributes?


ok, will split it in the next version.


Thanks.


> .