[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55effe20acc54ea4a96ea86015d99a5b@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 08:30:58 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Cong Wang' <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kici nski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: fix oops in socket ioctl cmd SIOCGSKNS when NET_NS
is disabled
From: Cong Wang
> Sent: 29 May 2021 20:15
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:08 PM Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> > index 27e3e7d53f8e..644b46112d35 100644
> > --- a/net/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/socket.c
> > @@ -1149,11 +1149,15 @@ static long sock_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > mutex_unlock(&vlan_ioctl_mutex);
> > break;
> > case SIOCGSKNS:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> > err = -EPERM;
> > if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> > break;
> >
> > err = open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns);
> > +#else
> > + err = -ENOTSUPP;
> > +#endif
>
> I wonder if it is easier if we just reject ns->ops==NULL case
> in open_related_ns(). For 1) we can save an ugly #ifdef here;
> 2) drivers/net/tun.c has the same bugs.
If CONFIG_NET_NS is unset then why not make both ns_capable()
and open_related_ns() unconditionally return -ENOTSUPP?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists