netdev - Re: [PATCH] NFC: nci: Remove redundant assignment to len

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:11:18 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: nci: Remove redundant assignment to len

On 01/06/2021 11:49, Yang Li wrote:
> Variable 'len' is set to conn_info->max_pkt_payload_len but this
> value is never read as it is overwritten with a new value later on,
> hence it is a redundant assignment and can be removed.
> 
> Clean up the following clang-analyzer warning:
> 
> net/nfc/nci/hci.c:164:3: warning: Value stored to 'len' is never read
> [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
> index 9686514..d6732e5 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,6 @@ static int nci_hci_send_data(struct nci_dev *ndev, u8 pipe,
>  	*(u8 *)skb_push(skb, 1) = data_type;
>  
>  	do {
> -		len = conn_info->max_pkt_payload_len;
> -
>  		/* If last packet add NCI_HFP_NO_CHAINING */
>  		if (i + conn_info->max_pkt_payload_len -
>  		    (skb->len + 1) >= data_len) {
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof