[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a6o8bqzs.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 10:38:47 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: Return -EINVAL instead of -EBUSY after
xsk_get_pool_from_qid() fails
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 6:02 AM Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> xsk_get_pool_from_qid() fails not because the device's queues are busy,
>> but because the queue_id exceeds the current number of queues.
>> So when it fails, it is better to return -EINVAL instead of -EBUSY.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> index 8de01aaac4a0..30ece117117a 100644
>> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (xsk_get_pool_from_qid(netdev, queue_id))
>> - return -EBUSY;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> I guess your intent here is to return -EINVAL only when the queue_id
> is larger than the number of active queues. But this patch also
> changes the return code when the queue id is already in use and in
> that case we should continue to return -EBUSY. As this function is
> used by a number of drivers, the easiest way to accomplish this is to
> introduce a test for queue_id out of bounds before this if-statement
> and return -EINVAL there.
Isn't the return code ABI by now, though?
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists