[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210602085626.2877926-3-kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:56:26 +0200
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/smc: no need to flush smcd_dev's event_wq before destroying it
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
destroy_workqueue() already calls drain_workqueue(), which is a stronger
variant of flush_workqueue().
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_ism.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
index 9c6e95882553..4dcc236d562e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
@@ -460,7 +460,6 @@ void smcd_unregister_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
mutex_unlock(&smcd_dev_list.mutex);
smcd->going_away = 1;
smc_smcd_terminate_all(smcd);
- flush_workqueue(smcd->event_wq);
destroy_workqueue(smcd->event_wq);
device_del(&smcd->dev);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists