[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210603132056.zklgtbsslbkgqtsn@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 16:20:56 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
Cc: Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
davem@...emloft.net, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
weifeng.voon@...el.com, boon.leong.ong@...el.com,
tee.min.tan@...el.com, vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com,
vee.khee.wong@...el.com, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net: stmmac: split xPCS setup
from mdio register
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 07:50:30PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> From: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
>
> This patch is a preparation patch for the enabling of Intel mGbE 2.5Gbps
> link speed. The Intel mGbR link speed configuration (1G/2.5G) is depends on
> a mdio ADHOC register which can be configured in the bios menu.
> As PHY interface might be different for 1G and 2.5G, the mdio bus need be
> ready to check the link speed and select the PHY interface before probing
> the xPCS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 7 ++
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 73 ++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> index b6cd43eda7ac..fd7212afc543 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ enum stmmac_state {
> int stmmac_mdio_unregister(struct net_device *ndev);
> int stmmac_mdio_register(struct net_device *ndev);
> int stmmac_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *mii);
> +int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct mii_bus *mii);
> void stmmac_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev);
>
> void stmmac_ptp_register(struct stmmac_priv *priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 13720bf6f6ff..eb81baeb13b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -7002,6 +7002,12 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> }
> }
>
> + if (priv->plat->mdio_bus_data->has_xpcs) {
> + ret = stmmac_xpcs_setup(priv->mii);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_xpcs_setup;
> + }
> +
I don't understand why this change is necessary?
The XPCS probing code was at the end of stmmac_mdio_register().
You moved the code right _after_ stmmac_mdio_register().
So the code flow is exactly the same.
> ret = stmmac_phy_setup(priv);
> if (ret) {
> netdev_err(ndev, "failed to setup phy (%d)\n", ret);
> @@ -7038,6 +7044,7 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> unregister_netdev(ndev);
> error_netdev_register:
> phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
> +error_xpcs_setup:
> error_phy_setup:
> if (priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_TBI &&
> priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_RTBI)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> index e293bf1ce9f3..3bb0a787f136 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,44 @@ int stmmac_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct mii_bus *bus)
> +{
> + int mode, max_addr, addr, found, ret;
> + struct net_device *ndev = bus->priv;
> + struct mdio_xpcs_args *xpcs;
> + struct stmmac_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + xpcs = &priv->hw->xpcs_args;
> + mode = priv->plat->phy_interface;
> + max_addr = PHY_MAX_ADDR;
> +
> + priv->hw->xpcs = mdio_xpcs_get_ops();
> + if (!priv->hw->xpcs)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* Try to probe the XPCS by scanning all addresses. */
> + xpcs->bus = bus;
> + found = 0;
> +
> + for (addr = 0; addr < max_addr; addr++) {
> + xpcs->addr = addr;
> +
> + ret = stmmac_xpcs_probe(priv, xpcs, mode);
> + if (!ret) {
> + found = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!found) {
> + dev_warn(priv->device, "No xPCS found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * stmmac_mdio_register
> * @ndev: net device structure
> @@ -444,14 +482,6 @@ int stmmac_mdio_register(struct net_device *ndev)
> max_addr = PHY_MAX_ADDR;
> }
>
> - if (mdio_bus_data->has_xpcs) {
> - priv->hw->xpcs = mdio_xpcs_get_ops();
> - if (!priv->hw->xpcs) {
> - err = -ENODEV;
> - goto bus_register_fail;
> - }
> - }
> -
> if (mdio_bus_data->needs_reset)
> new_bus->reset = &stmmac_mdio_reset;
>
> @@ -509,38 +539,11 @@ int stmmac_mdio_register(struct net_device *ndev)
> goto no_phy_found;
> }
>
> - /* Try to probe the XPCS by scanning all addresses. */
> - if (priv->hw->xpcs) {
> - struct mdio_xpcs_args *xpcs = &priv->hw->xpcs_args;
> - int ret, mode = priv->plat->phy_interface;
> - max_addr = PHY_MAX_ADDR;
> -
> - xpcs->bus = new_bus;
> -
> - found = 0;
> - for (addr = 0; addr < max_addr; addr++) {
> - xpcs->addr = addr;
> -
> - ret = stmmac_xpcs_probe(priv, xpcs, mode);
> - if (!ret) {
> - found = 1;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (!found && !mdio_node) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "No XPCS found\n");
> - err = -ENODEV;
> - goto no_xpcs_found;
> - }
> - }
> -
> bus_register_done:
> priv->mii = new_bus;
>
> return 0;
>
> -no_xpcs_found:
> no_phy_found:
> mdiobus_unregister(new_bus);
> bus_register_fail:
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists