[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210603170829.3168708-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:08:00 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 10/39] bpf: Add deny list of btf ids check for tracing programs
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit 35e3815fa8102fab4dee75f3547472c66581125d ]
The recursion check in __bpf_prog_enter and __bpf_prog_exit
leaves some (not inlined) functions unprotected:
In __bpf_prog_enter:
- migrate_disable is called before prog->active is checked
In __bpf_prog_exit:
- migrate_enable,rcu_read_unlock_strict are called after
prog->active is decreased
When attaching trampoline to them we get panic like:
traps: PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0
double fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_enter+0x4/0x50
...
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
bpf_trampoline_6442466513_0+0x18/0x1000
migrate_disable+0x5/0x50
__bpf_prog_enter+0x9/0x50
bpf_trampoline_6442466513_0+0x18/0x1000
migrate_disable+0x5/0x50
__bpf_prog_enter+0x9/0x50
bpf_trampoline_6442466513_0+0x18/0x1000
migrate_disable+0x5/0x50
__bpf_prog_enter+0x9/0x50
bpf_trampoline_6442466513_0+0x18/0x1000
migrate_disable+0x5/0x50
...
Fixing this by adding deny list of btf ids for tracing
programs and checking btf id during program verification.
Adding above functions to this list.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210429114712.43783-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 364b9760d1a7..553e09b404be 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12206,6 +12206,17 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
return 0;
}
+BTF_SET_START(btf_id_deny)
+BTF_ID_UNUSED
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+BTF_ID(func, migrate_disable)
+BTF_ID(func, migrate_enable)
+#endif
+#if !defined CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU && !defined CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+BTF_ID(func, rcu_read_unlock_strict)
+#endif
+BTF_SET_END(btf_id_deny)
+
static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
@@ -12265,6 +12276,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(&env->log, prog);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ } else if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+ btf_id_set_contains(&btf_id_deny, btf_id)) {
+ return -EINVAL;
}
key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(tgt_prog, btf_id);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists