[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fca958b-dcf3-6363-5f23-a2e7c4d16f87@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:08:17 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] net: sched: add bpf_link API for bpf
classifier
On 6/3/21 11:31 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> This commit introduces a bpf_link based kernel API for creating tc
> filters and using the cls_bpf classifier. Only a subset of what netlink
> API offers is supported, things like TCA_BPF_POLICE, TCA_RATE and
> embedded actions are unsupported.
>
> The kernel API and the libbpf wrapper added in a subsequent patch are
> more opinionated and mirror the semantics of low level netlink based
> TC-BPF API, i.e. always setting direct action mode, always setting
> protocol to ETH_P_ALL, and only exposing handle and priority as the
> variables the user can control. We add an additional gen_flags parameter
> though to allow for offloading use cases. It would be trivial to extend
> the current API to support specifying other attributes in the future,
> but for now I'm sticking how we want to push usage.
>
> The semantics around bpf_link support are as follows:
>
> A user can create a classifier attached to a filter using the bpf_link
> API, after which changing it and deleting it only happens through the
> bpf_link API. It is not possible to bind the bpf_link to existing
> filter, and any such attempt will fail with EEXIST. Hence EEXIST can be
> returned in two cases, when existing bpf_link owned filter exists, or
> existing netlink owned filter exists.
>
> Removing bpf_link owned filter from netlink returns EPERM, denoting that
> netlink is locked out from filter manipulation when bpf_link is
> involved.
>
> Whenever a filter is detached due to chain removal, or qdisc tear down,
> or net_device shutdown, the bpf_link becomes automatically detached.
>
> In this way, the netlink API and bpf_link creation path are exclusive
> and don't stomp over one another. Filters created using bpf_link API
> cannot be replaced by netlink API, and filters created by netlink API are
> never replaced by bpf_link. Netfilter also cannot detach bpf_link filters.
>
> We serialize all changes dover rtnl_lock as cls_bpf API doesn't support the
dover => over?
> unlocked classifier API.
>
> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>.
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 +
> include/net/pkt_cls.h | 13 ++
> include/net/sch_generic.h | 6 +-
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 15 +++
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 10 +-
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 250 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 7 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> subsys_initcall(tc_filter_init);
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_CLS_BPF)
> +
> +int bpf_tc_link_attach(union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> + struct tcf_chain_info chain_info;
> + u32 chain_index, prio, parent;
> + struct tcf_block *block;
> + struct tcf_chain *chain;
> + struct tcf_proto *tp;
> + int err, tp_created;
> + unsigned long cl;
> + struct Qdisc *q;
> + __be16 protocol;
> + void *fh;
> +
> + /* Caller already checks bpf_capable */
> + if (!ns_capable(current->nsproxy->net_ns->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
net->user_ns?
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (attr->link_create.flags ||
> + !attr->link_create.target_ifindex ||
> + !tc_flags_valid(attr->link_create.tc.gen_flags))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists