lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Jun 2021 07:47:23 +0200
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
        hch@...radead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue v4 1/4] Revert "PCI: Make
 pci_enable_ptm() private"

Dear Vinicius, dear Bjorn,


Am 05.06.21 um 01:27 schrieb Vinicius Costa Gomes:
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 03:09:30PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:

[…]

>>> Exposing this to the driver enables the driver to use the
>>> 'ptm_enabled' field of 'pci_dev' to check if PTM is enabled or not.
>>>
>>> This reverts commit ac6c26da29c12fa511c877c273ed5c939dc9e96c.
>>
>> Ideally I would cite this as ac6c26da29c1 ("PCI: Make pci_enable_ptm()
>> private") so there's a little more context.
> 
> Yeah, that looks better.
> 
> Will follow the suggestions you made in the next patch as well and send
> another version, thanks.

Just a note, that this is how revert commits are generated by `git 
revert` as the name of the reverted commit is in the commit message 
summary. Maybe just move the statement/sentence to the very top? But 
either way is fine.


Kind regards,

Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ