[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70d32740-eb4b-f7bf-146e-8dc06199d6c9@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 08:42:58 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
hch@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
helgaas@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue v5 3/4] igc: Enable PCIe PTM
Dear Vinicius,
Am 05.06.21 um 02:23 schrieb Vinicius Costa Gomes:
> Enables PCIe PTM (Precision Time Measurement) support in the igc
> driver. Notifies the PCI devices that PCIe PTM should be enabled.
>
> PCIe PTM is similar protocol to PTP (Precision Time Protocol) running
> in the PCIe fabric, it allows devices to report time measurements from
> their internal clocks and the correlation with the PCIe root clock.
>
> The i225 NIC exposes some registers that expose those time
> measurements, those registers will be used, in later patches, to
> implement the PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index a05e6d8ec660..f23d0303e53b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +
> #include <net/ipv6.h>
>
> #include "igc.h"
> @@ -5864,6 +5866,10 @@ static int igc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
>
> + err = pci_enable_ptm(pdev, NULL);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "PTM not supported\n");
> +
Sorry, if I am missing something, but do all devices supported by this
driver support PTM or only the i225 NIC? In that case, it wouldn’t be an
error for a device not supporting PTM, would it?
> pci_set_master(pdev);
>
> err = -ENOMEM;
>
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists