netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: tipc: fix FB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:51:20 -0700
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Cc:     ying.xue@...driver.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: tipc: fix FB_MTU eat two pages

On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:25:53AM -0400, Jon Maloy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/4/21 9:28 PM, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > Hello Maloy,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 3:20 AM Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > [...]
> > > Please don't add any extra file just for this little fix. We have enough
> > > files.
> > > Keep the macros in msg.h/c where they used to be.  You can still add
> > > your copyright line to those files.
> > > Regarding the macros kept inside msg.c, they are there because we design
> > > by the principle of minimal exposure, even among our module internal files.
> > > Otherwise it is ok.
> > > 
> > I don't want to add a new file too, but I found it's hard to define FB_MTU. I
> > tried to define it in msg.h, and 'crypto.h' should be included, which
> > 'BUF_HEADROOM' is defined in. However, 'msg.h' is already included in
> > 'crypto.h', so it doesn't work.
> > 
> > I tried to define FB_MTU in 'crypto.h', but it feels weird to define
> > it here. And
> > FB_MTU is also used in 'bcast.c', so it can't be defined in 'msg.c'.
> > 
> > I will see if there is a better solution.
> I think we can leverage the fact that this by definition is a node local
> message, and those are never encrypted.
> So, if you base FB_MTU on the non-crypto versions of BUF_HEADROOM and
> BUF_TAILROOM we should be safe.
> That will even give us better utilization of the space available.
> 

I think we misunderstanded something. If I base FB_MTU on the non-crypto
version of BUF_TAILROOM, it will eat 2 pages too. Because the
BUF_TAILROOM used in tipc_buf_acquire() is the crypto version, which is
larger than the non-crypto version:

struct sk_buff *tipc_buf_acquire(u32 size, gfp_t gfp)
{
	struct sk_buff *skb;
#ifdef CONFIG_TIPC_CRYPTO
	unsigned int buf_size = (BUF_HEADROOM + size + BUF_TAILROOM + 3) & ~3u;
#else
	unsigned int buf_size = (BUF_HEADROOM + size + 3) & ~3u;
#endif
	[..]
}

So if I use the non-crypto version, the size allocated will be:

  PAGE_SIZE - BUF_HEADROOM_non-crypto - BUF_TAILROOM_non-crypt +
    BUF_HEADROOM_crypto + BUF_TAILROOM_crypto

which is larger than PAGE_SIZE.

So, I think the simple way is to define FB_MTU in 'crypto.h'. Is this
acceptable?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong