netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH V3 10/11] HV/Netvsc: Add Isolation VM support for netvsc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:50:07 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        arnd@...db.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rppt@...nel.org,
        hannes@...xchg.org, cai@....pw, krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com,
        saravanand@...com, Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        robin.murphy@....com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
        sstabellini@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        brijesh.singh@....com, sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 10/11] HV/Netvsc: Add Isolation VM support for
 netvsc driver

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 11:06:27AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> +	if (hv_isolation_type_snp()) {
> +		pfns = kcalloc(buf_size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(unsigned long),
> +			       GFP_KERNEL);
> +		for (i = 0; i < buf_size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> +			pfns[i] = virt_to_hvpfn(net_device->recv_buf + i * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE) +
> +				(ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +		vaddr = vmap_pfn(pfns, buf_size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_KERNEL_IO);
> +		kfree(pfns);
> +		if (!vaddr)
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		net_device->recv_original_buf = net_device->recv_buf;
> +		net_device->recv_buf = vaddr;
> +	}

This probably wnats a helper to make the thing more readable.  But who
came up with this fucked up communication protocol where the host needs
to map random pfns into a contigous range?  Sometime I really have to
wonder what crack the hyper-v people take when comparing this to the
relatively sane approach others take.

> +	for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++)
> +		dma_unmap_single(&hv_dev->device, packet->dma_range[i].dma,
> +				 packet->dma_range[i].mapping_size,
> +				 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> +	kfree(packet->dma_range);

Any reason this isn't simply using a struct scatterlist?

> +	for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
> +		char *src = phys_to_virt((pb[i].pfn << HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT)
> +					 + pb[i].offset);
> +		u32 len = pb[i].len;
> +
> +		dma = dma_map_single(&hv_dev->device, src, len,
> +				     DMA_TO_DEVICE);

dma_map_single can only be used on page baked memory, and if this is
using page backed memory you wouldn't need to do thee phys_to_virt
tricks.  Can someone explain the mess here in more detail?

>  	struct rndis_device *dev = nvdev->extension;
>  	struct rndis_request *request = NULL;
> +	struct hv_device *hv_dev = ((struct net_device_context *)
> +			netdev_priv(ndev))->device_ctx;

Why not use a net_device_context local variable instead of this cast
galore?