netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/10] net: wwan: make WWAN_PORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZdPi9y=LXp0XVFR_+Wfnxt83tXfMcdR9MjQkcaXpZb7=Le5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 10:35:02 +0200
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To:     Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] net: wwan: make WWAN_PORT_MAX meaning less surprised

On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 06:02, Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It is quite unusual when some value can not be equal to a defined range
> max value. Also most subsystems defines FOO_TYPE_MAX as a maximum valid
> value. So turn the WAN_PORT_MAX meaning from the number of supported
> port types to the maximum valid port type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>