[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <588e062e-f1aa-6bc5-8011-380be7bf1176@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:24:11 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <andriin@...com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf fix for mixed tail calls and subprograms
On 6/8/21 12:29 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> We recently tried to use mixed programs that have both tail calls and
> subprograms, but it needs the attached fix. Also added a small test
> addition that will cause the failure without the fix.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> ---
>
> John Fastabend (2):
> bpf: Fix null ptr deref with mixed tail calls and subprogs
> bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls and tailcalls with insn patch
>
>
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
Don't know what happens. Apparently, the first patch made changes
in kernel/bpf/verifier.c, but it didn't show up in the above.
>
> --
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists