[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210610002155.196735-11-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 17:21:53 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 10/12] Revert "net/mlx5: Arm only EQs with EQEs"
From: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
In the scenario described below, an EQ can remain in FIRED state which
can result in missing an interrupt generation.
The scenario:
device mlx5_core driver
------ ----------------
EQ1.eqe generated
EQ1.MSI-X sent
EQ1.state = FIRED
EQ2.eqe generated
mlx5_irq()
polls - eq1_eqes()
arm eq1
polls - eq2_eqes()
arm eq2
EQ2.MSI-X sent
EQ2.state = FIRED
mlx5_irq()
polls - eq2_eqes() -- no eqes found
driver skips EQ arming;
->EQ2 remains fired, misses generating interrupt.
Hence, always arm the EQ by reverting the cited commit in fixes tag.
Fixes: d894892dda25 ("net/mlx5: Arm only EQs with EQEs")
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
index 77c0ca655975..940333410267 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int mlx5_eq_comp_int(struct notifier_block *nb,
eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq);
if (!eqe)
- return 0;
+ goto out;
do {
struct mlx5_core_cq *cq;
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ static int mlx5_eq_comp_int(struct notifier_block *nb,
++eq->cons_index;
} while ((++num_eqes < MLX5_EQ_POLLING_BUDGET) && (eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq)));
+
+out:
eq_update_ci(eq, 1);
if (cqn != -1)
@@ -248,9 +250,9 @@ static int mlx5_eq_async_int(struct notifier_block *nb,
++eq->cons_index;
} while ((++num_eqes < MLX5_EQ_POLLING_BUDGET) && (eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq)));
- eq_update_ci(eq, 1);
out:
+ eq_update_ci(eq, 1);
mlx5_eq_async_int_unlock(eq_async, recovery, &flags);
return unlikely(recovery) ? num_eqes : 0;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists