[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABdtJHv-Xu5bC2-T7a0UgbYpkNP1SLfWwdLWLLKj5MBvA2Ajyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 19:51:03 +0200
From: Jon Nettleton <jon@...id-run.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....com>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
"<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/15] ACPI support for dpaa2 driver
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:56 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:39:02PM +0300, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> >
> > This patch set provides ACPI support to DPAA2 network drivers.
>
> Just to be clear and avoid confusion, there is a standing NACK against
> this patchset. Please see the discussion here:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/#23518385
>
> So far, i've not seen any indication the issues raised there have been
> resolved. I don't see any Acked-by from an ACPI maintainer. So this
> code remains NACKed.
Andrew,
The ACPI maintainers did bless the use of the ACPI standards followed
in this patchset, and their only abstinence from ACK'ing the patchset
was whether the code was used in production systems. Well currently,
not only have we, SolidRun, been using this patchset and the associated
ACPI tables in our SystemsReady certified firmware for the HoneyComb,
but we also have customers using this same patchset and firmware on
their systems rolled out to customers.
Additionally we have an entire new product line based on Marvell's
Armada CN913x series, which also needs this patchset to be fully
functional.
I am quite certain this is more than enough production systems using
this ACPI description method for networking to progress this patchset
forward.
-Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists