[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210610233250.pef2dwo2r5atluwt@kafai-mbp>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:32:50 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 04/17] xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to
redirect map entries
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:19:04AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> @@ -149,7 +152,8 @@ static int xsk_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> >> u64 map_flags)
> >> {
> >> struct xsk_map *m = container_of(map, struct xsk_map, map);
> >> - struct xdp_sock *xs, *old_xs, **map_entry;
> >> + struct xdp_sock __rcu **map_entry;
> >> + struct xdp_sock *xs, *old_xs;
> >> u32 i = *(u32 *)key, fd = *(u32 *)value;
> >> struct xsk_map_node *node;
> >> struct socket *sock;
> >> @@ -179,7 +183,7 @@ static int xsk_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> >> }
> >>
> >> spin_lock_bh(&m->lock);
> >> - old_xs = READ_ONCE(*map_entry);
> >> + old_xs = rcu_dereference_check(*map_entry, rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> > Is it actually protected by the m->lock at this point?
>
> True, can just add that to the check.
this should be enough
rcu_dereference_protected(*map_entry, lockdep_is_held(&m->lock));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists