netdev - [PATCH v11 02/18] af_vsock: separate wait data loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210611111010.3651173-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:10:07 +0300
From:   Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>
CC:     <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 02/18] af_vsock: separate wait data loop

Wait loop for data could be shared between SEQPACKET and STREAM
sockets, so move it to dedicated function. While moving the code
around, let's update an old comment.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 7dd8e70d78cd..4269e80b02cd 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1833,6 +1833,69 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
+			   long timeout,
+			   struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data *recv_data,
+			   size_t target)
+{
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	s64 data;
+	int err;
+
+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	err = 0;
+	transport = vsk->transport;
+
+	while ((data = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) == 0) {
+		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+
+		if (sk->sk_err != 0 ||
+		    (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
+		    (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)) {
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
+		if (timeout == 0) {
+			err = -EAGAIN;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (recv_data) {
+			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_block(vsk, target, recv_data);
+			if (err < 0)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		release_sock(sk);
+		timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+		lock_sock(sk);
+
+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
+			err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
+			break;
+		} else if (timeout == 0) {
+			err = -EAGAIN;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait);
+
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	/* Internal transport error when checking for available
+	 * data. XXX This should be changed to a connection
+	 * reset in a later change.
+	 */
+	if (data < 0)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	return data;
+}
+
 static int
 vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 			  int flags)
@@ -1912,85 +1975,34 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 
 
 	while (1) {
-		s64 ready;
+		ssize_t read;
 
-		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-		ready = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk);
+		err = vsock_wait_data(sk, &wait, timeout, &recv_data, target);
+		if (err <= 0)
+			break;
 
-		if (ready == 0) {
-			if (sk->sk_err != 0 ||
-			    (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
-			    (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)) {
-				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-				break;
-			}
-			/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
-			if (timeout == 0) {
-				err = -EAGAIN;
-				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-				break;
-			}
-
-			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_block(
-					vsk, target, &recv_data);
-			if (err < 0) {
-				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-				break;
-			}
-			release_sock(sk);
-			timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
-			lock_sock(sk);
-
-			if (signal_pending(current)) {
-				err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
-				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-				break;
-			} else if (timeout == 0) {
-				err = -EAGAIN;
-				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-				break;
-			}
-		} else {
-			ssize_t read;
-
-			finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
-
-			if (ready < 0) {
-				/* Invalid queue pair content. XXX This should
-				* be changed to a connection reset in a later
-				* change.
-				*/
-
-				err = -ENOMEM;
-				goto out;
-			}
-
-			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_dequeue(
-					vsk, target, &recv_data);
-			if (err < 0)
-				break;
+		err = transport->notify_recv_pre_dequeue(vsk, target,
+							 &recv_data);
+		if (err < 0)
+			break;
 
-			read = transport->stream_dequeue(
-					vsk, msg,
-					len - copied, flags);
-			if (read < 0) {
-				err = -ENOMEM;
-				break;
-			}
+		read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
+		if (read < 0) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
 
-			copied += read;
+		copied += read;
 
-			err = transport->notify_recv_post_dequeue(
-					vsk, target, read,
-					!(flags & MSG_PEEK), &recv_data);
-			if (err < 0)
-				goto out;
+		err = transport->notify_recv_post_dequeue(vsk, target, read,
+						!(flags & MSG_PEEK), &recv_data);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto out;
 
-			if (read >= target || flags & MSG_PEEK)
-				break;
+		if (read >= target || flags & MSG_PEEK)
+			break;
 
-			target -= read;
-		}
+		target -= read;
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_err)
-- 
2.25.1