[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210611192417.gvfxi2kbfjx4jv3d@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:24:17 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect():
extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:15:26AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This patch extends the flags of the phy that's being connected with the
> port specific flags of the switch port.
>
> This is needed to handle a port specific erratum of the KSZ8873 switch,
> which is added in a later patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
What happens differently between having this patch and not having it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists