netdev - [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: delete repeated word of block comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1623393419-2521-4-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:36:54 +0800
From:   Weihang Li <liweihang@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <hkallweit1@...il.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@...wei.com>,
        Weihang Li <liweihang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: delete repeated word of block comments

From: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@...wei.com>

Fix syntax errors in block comments.

Signed-off-by: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c | 2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
index f4816b7..c617dbc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_an_config_aneg);
  * @phydev: target phy_device struct
  *
  * Disable auto-negotiation in the Clause 45 PHY. The link parameters
- * parameters are controlled through the PMA/PMD MMD registers.
+ * are controlled through the PMA/PMD MMD registers.
  *
  * Returns zero on success, negative errno code on failure.
  */
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 37f722c..34e9021 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
 
 	case SFP_S_INIT:
 		if (event == SFP_E_TIMEOUT && sfp->state & SFP_F_TX_FAULT) {
-			/* TX_FAULT is still asserted after t_init or
+			/* TX_FAULT is still asserted after t_init
 			 * or t_start_up, so assume there is a fault.
 			 */
 			sfp_sm_fault(sfp, SFP_S_INIT_TX_FAULT,
-- 
2.8.1