netdev - [PATCH net] cxgb4: fix wrong ethtool n-tuple rule lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 12 Jun 2021 19:20:44 +0530
From:   Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, rajur@...lsio.com
Subject: [PATCH net] cxgb4: fix wrong ethtool n-tuple rule lookup

The TID returned during successful filter creation is relative to
the region in which the filter is created. Using it directly always
returns Hi Prio/Normal filter region's entry for the first couple of
entries, even though the rule is actually inserted in Hash region.
Fix by analyzing in which region the filter has been inserted and
save the absolute TID to be used for lookup later.

Fixes: db43b30cd89c ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion")
Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
---
 .../ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c    | 24 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
index df20485b5744..83ed10ac8660 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
@@ -1624,16 +1624,14 @@ static struct filter_entry *cxgb4_get_filter_entry(struct adapter *adap,
 						   u32 ftid)
 {
 	struct tid_info *t = &adap->tids;
-	struct filter_entry *f;
 
-	if (ftid < t->nhpftids)
-		f = &adap->tids.hpftid_tab[ftid];
-	else if (ftid < t->nftids)
-		f = &adap->tids.ftid_tab[ftid - t->nhpftids];
-	else
-		f = lookup_tid(&adap->tids, ftid);
+	if (ftid >= t->hpftid_base && ftid < t->hpftid_base + t->nhpftids)
+		return &t->hpftid_tab[ftid - t->hpftid_base];
+
+	if (ftid >= t->ftid_base && ftid < t->ftid_base + t->nftids)
+		return &t->ftid_tab[ftid - t->ftid_base];
 
-	return f;
+	return lookup_tid(t, ftid);
 }
 
 static void cxgb4_fill_filter_rule(struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fs,
@@ -1840,6 +1838,11 @@ static int cxgb4_ntuple_del_filter(struct net_device *dev,
 	filter_id = filter_info->loc_array[cmd->fs.location];
 	f = cxgb4_get_filter_entry(adapter, filter_id);
 
+	if (f->fs.prio)
+		filter_id -= adapter->tids.hpftid_base;
+	else if (!f->fs.hash)
+		filter_id -= (adapter->tids.ftid_base - adapter->tids.nhpftids);
+
 	ret = cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(dev, f->fs.tc_prio, &f->fs, filter_id);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err;
@@ -1899,6 +1902,11 @@ static int cxgb4_ntuple_set_filter(struct net_device *netdev,
 
 	filter_info = &adapter->ethtool_filters->port[pi->port_id];
 
+	if (fs.prio)
+		tid += adapter->tids.hpftid_base;
+	else if (!fs.hash)
+		tid += (adapter->tids.ftid_base - adapter->tids.nhpftids);
+
 	filter_info->loc_array[cmd->fs.location] = tid;
 	set_bit(cmd->fs.location, filter_info->bmap);
 	filter_info->in_use++;
-- 
2.27.0