lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:21:24 +0800
From:   "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
        <ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: z85230: remove redundant
 initialization for statics


在 2021/6/14 0:22, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 03:38:16PM +0800, Guangbin Huang wrote:
>> From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
>>
>> Should not initialise statics to 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wan/z85230.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> index 94ed9a2..f815bb5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ irqreturn_t z8530_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>   {
>>   	struct z8530_dev *dev=dev_id;
>>   	u8 intr;
>> -	static volatile int locker=0;
>> +	static int locker;
> Is the volatile unneeded? Please document that in the commit message.
>
>     Andrew
> .
Hi,  Andrew:

When i create this patch, it will WARNING: Use of volatile is usually 
wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
According to the file in kernel: 
Documentation/process/volatile-considered-​harmful.rst
the "volatile" type class should not be used.
So i remove  "volatile" in this patch.

I will add the reason in commit log Next version.

Thanks.

Peng Li


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ