netdev - [PATCH V2 net-next 07/11] net: z85230: fix the code style issue about "if..else.."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1623670131-49973-8-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:28:47 +0800
From:   Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
        <ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lipeng321@...wei.com>, <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 net-next 07/11] net: z85230: fix the code style issue about "if..else.."

From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>

According to the chackpatch.pl, else should follow close brace '}',
braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement.

Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wan/z85230.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
index a3a2051..556de05 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
@@ -354,9 +354,7 @@ static void z8530_rx(struct z8530_channel *c)
 					/* printk("crc error\n"); */
 				}
 				/* Shove the frame upstream */
-			}
-			else
-			{
+			} else {
 				/*	Drop the lock for RX processing, or
 		 		 *	there are deadlocks
 		 		 */
@@ -489,9 +487,7 @@ static void z8530_dma_rx(struct z8530_channel *chan)
 		}		
 		write_zsctrl(chan, ERR_RES);
 		write_zsctrl(chan, RES_H_IUS);
-	}
-	else
-	{
+	} else {
 		/* DMA is off right now, drain the slow way */
 		z8530_rx(chan);
 	}	
@@ -1379,9 +1375,7 @@ static void z8530_tx_begin(struct z8530_channel *c)
 			release_dma_lock(flags);
 		}
 		c->txcount=0;
-	}
-	else
-	{
+	} else {
 		c->txcount=c->tx_skb->len;
 
 		if(c->dma_tx)
@@ -1412,9 +1406,7 @@ static void z8530_tx_begin(struct z8530_channel *c)
 			release_dma_lock(flags);
 			write_zsctrl(c, RES_EOM_L);
 			write_zsreg(c, R5, c->regs[R5]|TxENAB);
-		}
-		else
-		{
+		} else {
 			/* ABUNDER off */
 			write_zsreg(c, R10, c->regs[10]);
 			write_zsctrl(c, RES_Tx_CRC);
@@ -1530,12 +1522,12 @@ static void z8530_rx_done(struct z8530_channel *c)
 			 * from passing
 			 */
 			write_zsreg(c, R0, RES_Rx_CRC);
-		}
-		else
+		} else {
 			/* Can't occur as we dont reenable the DMA irq until
 			 * after the flip is done
 			 */
 			netdev_warn(c->netdevice, "DMA flip overrun!\n");
+		}
 
 		release_dma_lock(flags);
 
@@ -1661,9 +1653,9 @@ netdev_tx_t z8530_queue_xmit(struct z8530_channel *c, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		c->tx_next_ptr=c->tx_dma_buf[c->tx_dma_used];
 		c->tx_dma_used^=1;	/* Flip temp buffer */
 		skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, c->tx_next_ptr, skb->len);
+	} else {
+		c->tx_next_ptr = skb->data;
 	}
-	else
-		c->tx_next_ptr=skb->data;	
 	RT_LOCK;
 	c->tx_next_skb=skb;
 	RT_UNLOCK;
-- 
2.8.1