netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210615163108.4e17e119@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:31:08 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
Cc:     Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx_bind

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:01:13 +0800
Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:00 AM Pavel Skripkin
> <paskripkin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:37:12 +0800
> > Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The commit 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in
> > > smsc75xx_bind") fails to clean up the work scheduled in
> > > smsc75xx_reset-> smsc75xx_set_multicast, which leads to
> > > use-after-free if the work is scheduled to start after the
> > > deallocation. In addition, this patch also removes one dangling
> > > pointer - dev->data[0].
> > >
> > > This patch calls cancel_work_sync to cancel the schedule work and
> > > set the dangling pointer to NULL.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c index b286993da67c..f81740fcc8d5
> > > 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > @@ -1504,7 +1504,10 @@ static int smsc75xx_bind(struct usbnet
> > > *dev, struct usb_interface *intf) return 0;
> > >
> > >  err:
> > > +     cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast);
> > >       kfree(pdata);
> > > +     pdata = NULL;
> > > +     dev->data[0] = 0;
> > >       return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> >
> > Hi, Dongliang!
> >
> > Just my thougth about this patch:
> >
> > INIT_WORK(&pdata->set_multicast, smsc75xx_deferred_multicast_write);
> > does not queue anything, it just initalizes list structure and
> > assigns callback function. The actual work sheduling happens in
> > smsc75xx_set_multicast() which is smsc75xx_netdev_ops member.
> >
> 
> Yes, you are right. However, as written in the commit message,
> smsc75xx_set_multicast will be called by smsc75xx_reset [1].
> 
> If smsc75xx_set_multicast is called before any check failure occurs,
> this work(set_multicast) will be queued into the global list with
> 
> schedule_work(&pdata->set_multicast); [2]

Ah, I missed it, sorry :)

Maybe, small optimization for error handling path like:

cancel_work:
	cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast);
	dev->data[0] = 0;
free_pdata:
	kfree(pdata);
	return ret;


is suitbale here.

> 
> At last, if the pdata or dev->data[0] is freed before the
> set_multicast really executes, it may lead to a UAF. Is this correct?
> 
> BTW, even if the above is true, I don't know if I call the API
> ``cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast)'' properly if the
> schedule_work is not called.
> 

Yeah, it will be ok.

> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c#L1322
> 
> [2]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c#L583
> 
> > In case of any error in smsc75xx_bind() the device registration
> > fails and smsc75xx_netdev_ops won't be registered, so, i guess,
> > there is no chance of UAF.
> >
> >
> > Am I missing something? :)
> >
> >
> >
> > With regards,
> > Pavel Skripkin




With regards,
Pavel Skripkin