[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMkLKt42M6Wjut3O@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:18:50 +0300
From: andy@...facebook.localdomain
To: Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
calvin.johnson@....nxp.com,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux.cj@...il.com, Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 13/15] net: phylink: introduce
phylink_fwnode_phy_connect()
Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:53:59PM +0300, Ioana Ciornei kirjoitti:
> From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
>
> Define phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() to connect phy specified by
> a fwnode to a phylink instance.
...
> +/**
> + * phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() - connect the PHY specified in the fwnode.
> + * @pl: a pointer to a &struct phylink returned from phylink_create()
> + * @fwnode: a pointer to a &struct fwnode_handle.
> + * @flags: PHY-specific flags to communicate to the PHY device driver
> + *
> + * Connect the phy specified @fwnode to the phylink instance specified
> + * by @pl.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative errno.
> + */
> +int phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(struct phylink *pl,
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + u32 flags)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *phy_fwnode;
> + struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Fixed links and 802.3z are handled without needing a PHY */
> + if (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_FIXED ||
> + (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_INBAND &&
> + phy_interface_mode_is_8023z(pl->link_interface)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + phy_fwnode = fwnode_get_phy_node(fwnode);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy_fwnode)) {
> + if (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_PHY)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + phy_dev = fwnode_phy_find_device(phy_fwnode);
> + /* We're done with the phy_node handle */
> + fwnode_handle_put(phy_fwnode);
As per previous mail, who and when acquire this reference counting? Can it be
possible that caller will never call phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() and hence
reference counting will become disbalances?
We need to fix all this before the release.
> + if (!phy_dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy_dev, flags,
> + pl->link_interface);
> + if (ret) {
> + phy_device_free(phy_dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = phylink_bringup_phy(pl, phy_dev, pl->link_config.interface);
> + if (ret)
> + phy_detach(phy_dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists