netdev - [PATCH V2 net-next 04/10] net: z85230: replace comparison to NULL with "!skb"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:43:39 +0800
From:   Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
        <ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lipeng321@...wei.com>, <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 net-next 04/10] net: z85230: replace comparison to NULL with "!skb"

From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>

According to the chackpatch.pl, comparison to NULL could
be written "!skb".

Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wan/z85230.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
index 94ed9a2..0162239 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
@@ -851,12 +851,12 @@ int z8530_sync_dma_open(struct net_device *dev, struct z8530_channel *c)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 	 
 	c->rx_buf[0]=(void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA);
-	if(c->rx_buf[0]==NULL)
+	if (!c->rx_buf[0])
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 	c->rx_buf[1]=c->rx_buf[0]+PAGE_SIZE/2;
 	
 	c->tx_dma_buf[0]=(void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA);
-	if(c->tx_dma_buf[0]==NULL)
+	if (!c->tx_dma_buf[0])
 	{
 		free_page((unsigned long)c->rx_buf[0]);
 		c->rx_buf[0]=NULL;
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ int z8530_sync_txdma_open(struct net_device *dev, struct z8530_channel *c)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 	 
 	c->tx_dma_buf[0]=(void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA);
-	if(c->tx_dma_buf[0]==NULL)
+	if (!c->tx_dma_buf[0])
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
 	c->tx_dma_buf[1] = c->tx_dma_buf[0] + PAGE_SIZE/2;
@@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@ static void z8530_tx_begin(struct z8530_channel *c)
 	c->tx_next_skb=NULL;
 	c->tx_ptr=c->tx_next_ptr;
 	
-	if(c->tx_skb==NULL)
+	if (!c->tx_skb)
 	{
 		/* Idle on */
 		if(c->dma_tx)
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static void z8530_tx_done(struct z8530_channel *c)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	/* Actually this can happen.*/
-	if (c->tx_skb == NULL)
+	if (!c->tx_skb)
 		return;
 
 	skb = c->tx_skb;
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static void z8530_rx_done(struct z8530_channel *c)
 		 */
 
 		skb = dev_alloc_skb(ct);
-		if (skb == NULL) {
+		if (!skb) {
 			c->netdevice->stats.rx_dropped++;
 			netdev_warn(c->netdevice, "Memory squeeze\n");
 		} else {
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ static void z8530_rx_done(struct z8530_channel *c)
 		RT_UNLOCK;
 
 		c->skb2 = dev_alloc_skb(c->mtu);
-		if (c->skb2 == NULL)
+		if (!c->skb2)
 			netdev_warn(c->netdevice, "memory squeeze\n");
 		else
 			skb_put(c->skb2, c->mtu);
-- 
2.8.1