netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] vsock: rename vsock_has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:50:29 +0300
From:   Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] vsock: rename vsock_has_data()


On 18.06.2021 16:35, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> vsock_has_data() is used only by STREAM and SEQPACKET sockets,
> so let's rename it to vsock_connectible_has_data(), using the same
> nomenclature (connectible) used in other functions after the
> introduction of SEQPACKET.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 67954afef4e1..de8249483081 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_data);
>  
> -static s64 vsock_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> +static s64 vsock_connectible_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>  {
>  	struct sock *sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
>  
> @@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
>  	err = 0;
>  	transport = vsk->transport;
>  
> -	while ((data = vsock_has_data(vsk)) == 0) {
> +	while ((data = vsock_connectible_has_data(vsk)) == 0) {
>  		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>  
>  		if (sk->sk_err != 0 ||
LGTM