netdev - [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: at91_can: add braces {} to all arms of the statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:56:27 +0800
From:   Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To:     <wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
        <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: at91_can: add braces {} to all arms of the statement

From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>

Braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement.

Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
index 394fc72d39ac..5d984a448de4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
@@ -585,9 +585,9 @@ static void at91_read_mb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int mb,
 	reg_msr = at91_read(priv, AT91_MSR(mb));
 	cf->len = can_cc_dlc2len((reg_msr >> 16) & 0xf);
 
-	if (reg_msr & AT91_MSR_MRTR)
+	if (reg_msr & AT91_MSR_MRTR) {
 		cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
-	else {
+	} else {
 		*(u32 *)(cf->data + 0) = at91_read(priv, AT91_MDL(mb));
 		*(u32 *)(cf->data + 4) = at91_read(priv, AT91_MDH(mb));
 	}
@@ -1020,15 +1020,15 @@ static void at91_irq_err(struct net_device *dev)
 		reg_sr = at91_read(priv, AT91_SR);
 
 		/* we need to look at the unmasked reg_sr */
-		if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_BOFF))
+		if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_BOFF)) {
 			new_state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
-		else if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_ERRP))
+		} else if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_ERRP)) {
 			new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
-		else if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_WARN))
+		} else if (unlikely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_WARN)) {
 			new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
-		else if (likely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_ERRA))
+		} else if (likely(reg_sr & AT91_IRQ_ERRA)) {
 			new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
-		else {
+		} else {
 			netdev_err(dev, "BUG! hardware in undefined state\n");
 			return;
 		}
-- 
2.8.1