lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d03a69ce5a06f50230700b0e94e50193@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:44:51 -0600
From:   subashab@...eaurora.org
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Sean Tranchetti <stranche@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: qualcomm: rmnet: fix two pointer math bugs

On 2021-06-21 01:18, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:11:58AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 01:12:09PM -0600, subashab@...eaurora.org 
>> wrote:
>> > On 2021-06-19 07:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Dan
>> >
>> > Thanks for fixing this. Could you cast the ip4h to char* instead of void*.
>> > Looks like gcc might raise issues if -Wpointer-arith is used.
>> >
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/Pointer-Arith.html#Pointer-Arith
>> 
>> The fix for that is to not enable -Wpointer-arith.  The warning is 
>> dumb.
> 
> Sorry, that was uncalled for and not correct.  The GCC warning would be
> useful if we were trying to write portable userspace code.  But in the
> kernel the kernel uses GCC extensions a lot.
> 
> The Clang compiler can also compile the kernel these days.  But it had
> to add support for a bunch of GCC extensions to make that work.  Really
> most of linux userspace is written with GCC in mind so Clang had to do
> this anyway.
> 
> So we will never enable -Wpointer-arith in the kernel because there is
> no need.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Thanks for the clarification.

Reviewed-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ