[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB477189838CFCDB952D4B064BD5099@CO1PR11MB4771.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 04:21:47 +0000
From: "Ismail, Mohammad Athari" <mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com>
To: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"hmehrtens@...linear.com" <hmehrtens@...linear.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tmohren@...linear.com" <tmohren@...linear.com>,
"vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com" <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>,
"lxu@...linear.com" <lxu@...linear.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: phy: add Maxlinear GPY115/21x/24x driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ismail, Mohammad Athari <mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 12:15 PM
> To: Ismail, Mohammad Athari <mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com>
> Subject:
>
> > Net-next:
> >
> > int genphy_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable) {
> > if (enable) {
> > u16 val, ctl = BMCR_LOOPBACK;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (phydev->speed == SPEED_1000)
> > ctl |= BMCR_SPEED1000;
> > else if (phydev->speed == SPEED_100)
> > ctl |= BMCR_SPEED100;
> >
> > if (phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL)
> > ctl |= BMCR_FULLDPLX;
> >
> > phy_modify(phydev, MII_BMCR, ~0, ctl);
> >
> > ret = phy_read_poll_timeout(phydev, MII_BMSR, val,
> > val & BMSR_LSTATUS,
> > 5000, 500000, true);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > } else {
> > phy_modify(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_LOOPBACK, 0);
> >
> > phy_config_aneg(phydev);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > v5.12.11:
> >
> > int genphy_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable) {
> > return phy_modify(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_LOOPBACK,
> > enable ? BMCR_LOOPBACK : 0); }
> >
> >
> > Not sure whether anyone else reported similar issue.
>
> The commit message says:
>
> net: phy: genphy_loopback: add link speed configuration
>
> In case of loopback, in most cases we need to disable autoneg support
> and force some speed configuration. Otherwise, depending on currently
> active auto negotiated link speed, the loopback may or may not work.
>
> > Should I use phy_modify to set the LOOPBACK bit only in my driver
> > implementation as force speed with loopback enable does not work in
> > our device?
>
> So you appear to have the exact opposite problem, you need to use auto-
> neg, with yourself, in order to have link. So there are two
> solutions:
>
> 1) As you say, implement it in your driver
>
> 2) Add a second generic implementation, which enables autoneg, if it is not
> enabled, sets the loopback bit, and waits for the link to come up.
>
> Does your PHY driver error out when asked to do a forced mode? It probably
> should, if your silicon does not support that part of C22.
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
We also observe same issue on Marvell88E1510 PHY (C22 supported PHY) as well. It works with v5.12.11's genphy_loopback() but not net-next's.
Regards,
Athari
Powered by blists - more mailing lists