[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210623110727.221922-8-toke@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:07:15 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Guy Tzalik <gtzalik@...zon.com>,
Saeed Bishara <saeedb@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/19] ena: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
The ena driver has rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs around XDP
program invocations. However, the actual lifetime of the objects referred
by the XDP program invocation is longer, all the way through to the call to
xdp_do_flush(), making the scope of the rcu_read_lock() too small. This
turns out to be harmless because it all happens in a single NAPI poll
cycle (and thus under local_bh_disable()), but it makes the rcu_read_lock()
misleading.
Rather than extend the scope of the rcu_read_lock(), just get rid of it
entirely. With the addition of RCU annotations to the XDP_REDIRECT map
types that take bh execution into account, lockdep even understands this to
be safe, so there's really no reason to keep it around.
Cc: Guy Tzalik <gtzalik@...zon.com>
Cc: Saeed Bishara <saeedb@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
index 881f88754bf6..a4378b14af4c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
@@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int ena_xdp_execute(struct ena_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
u64 *xdp_stat;
int qid;
- rcu_read_lock();
xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_bpf_prog);
if (!xdp_prog)
@@ -443,8 +442,6 @@ static int ena_xdp_execute(struct ena_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
ena_increase_stat(xdp_stat, 1, &rx_ring->syncp);
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
return verdict;
}
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists