[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210624122435.11887-1-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:24:35 +0800
From: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>, <chao.song@...iatek.com>,
<kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>, Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: if_arp: add ARPHRD_PUREIP type
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 11:04 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:13:10PM +0800, Rocco Yue wrote:
>> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 07:29 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the explaination, why is this hardware somehow "special" in
>>> this way that this has never been needed before?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>
>> Before kernel-4.18, RAWIP was the same as PUREIP, neither of them
>> automatically generates an IPv6 link-local address, and the way to
>> generate an IPv6 global address is the same.
>>
>> After kernel-4.18 (include 4.18 version), the behavior of RAWIP had
>> changed due to the following patch:
>> @@ static int ipv6_generate_eui64(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
>> + case ARPHRD_RAWIP:
>> + return addrconf_ifid_rawip(eui, dev);
>> }
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> the reason why the kernel doesn't need to generate the link-local
>> address automatically is as follows:
>>
>> In the 3GPP 29.061, here is some description as follows:
>> "in order to avoid any conflict between the link-local address of
>> MS and that of the GGSN, the Interface-Identifier used by the MS to
>> build its link-local address shall be assigned by the GGSN. The GGSN
>> ensures the uniqueness of this Interface-Identifier. Then MT shall
>> then enforce the use of this Interface-Identifier by the TE"
>>
>> In other words, in the cellular network, GGSN determines whether to
>> reply to the Router Solicitation message of UE by identifying the
>> low 64bits of UE interface's ipv6 link-local address.
>>
>> When using a new kernel and RAWIP, kernel will generate an EUI64
>> format ipv6 link-local address, and if the device uses this address
>> to send RS, GGSN will not reply RA message.
>>
>> Therefore, in that background, we came up with PUREIP to make kernel
>> doesn't generate a ipv6 link-local address in any address generate
>> mode.
>
> Thanks for the better description. That should go into the changelog
> text somewhere so that others know what is going on here with this new
> option.
>
Does changelog mean adding these details to the commit message ?
I am willing do it.
> And are these user-visable flags documented in a man page or something
> else somewhere? If not, how does userspace know about them?
>
There are mappings of these device types value in the libc:
"/bionic/libc/kernel/uapi/linux/if_arp.h".
userspace can get it from here.
But I also failed to find a man page or a description of these
device types.
Thanks,
Rocco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists