lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:56:44 +0300
From:   Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@...il.com>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 problem on 486.

Hi Maciej,

23.06.2021 4:04, Maciej W. Rozycki:
[...]
>   Ah, so this is the SiS 85C496/497 chipset; another one that does not have
> its southbridge visible in the PCI configuration space, perhaps because it
> doesn't put the southbridge on PCI in the first place, and instead it maps
> its configuration registers in the upper half of the northbridge's space.
> Oh, the joys of early attempts!

I see your patches for this chipset have now arrived and I'll test them 
as soon as I get to that box.
Meanwhile I've captured a similar log from another (and actually this 
one is my main concern because it can not be replaced easily):

https://pastebin.com/NVfRcMww

Something is clearly different here, 8259A.pl reports all irqs are edge 
no matter what. BIOS setup only offers some strange "PCI IDE IRQ mode" 
(Edge/Level) and apparently it has no effect anyway.
(A modified version of 8139too works fine though)


Thank you,

Regards,
Nikolai

>   It does PCI interrupt steering, it has the ELCR, but we don't have a PIRQ
> router implemented for it.  I have a datasheet, so this should be fairly
> trivial to do, and hopefully things will then work automagically, no need
> for hacks.
>
>   It's very late tonight here, so let me come back with something tomorrow.
>
>    Maciej
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ