[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAjEthEoZk8LLWhhwMaTy0nrh5qaeY6ouUu--Uv2D_Zr+1pug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 02:02:30 -0500
From: Johaan Smith <johaansmith74@...il.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@...ux.ibm.com>, cforno12@...ux.ibm.com,
Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/7] Revert "ibmvnic: remove duplicate napi_schedule
call in open function"
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:17 PM Sukadev Bhattiprolu
<sukadev@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> This reverts commit 7c451f3ef676c805a4b77a743a01a5c21a250a73.
>
> When a vnic interface is taken down and then up, connectivity is not
> restored. We bisected it to this commit. Reverting this commit until
> we can fully investigate the issue/benefit of the change.
>
Sometimes git bisect may lead us to the false positives. Full investigation is
always the best solution if it is not too hard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists