netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: bridge: ignore switchdev events for LAG ports which didn't request replay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210625214852.sjdmjv3jq4rjszea@skbuf>
Date:   Sat, 26 Jun 2021 00:48:52 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: bridge: ignore switchdev events for
 LAG ports which didn't request replay

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:53:18PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> @@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ bool br_port_flag_is_set(const struct net_device *dev, unsigned long flag);
>  u8 br_port_get_stp_state(const struct net_device *dev);
>  clock_t br_get_ageing_time(struct net_device *br_dev);
>  int br_fdb_replay(struct net_device *br_dev, struct net_device *dev,
> -		  struct notifier_block *nb);
> +		  void *ctx, struct notifier_block *nb);
>  #else
>  static inline struct net_device *
>  br_fdb_find_port(const struct net_device *br_dev,

Damn, I forgot a "const void *" here and it blew up everything.
Sorry, my fault. I'll use the extra time to test the patches some more
and give reviewers more time, will resend some time tomorrow.